Vol. 23 No. 2 (2025): Nature, Myth, Design
Nuovi miti / New Myths

Piuforesta. Il bosco di Piubega e la foresta planiziale padana

Marialessandra Secchi
Dipartimento di architettura e Studi Urbani (DAStU), Politecnico di Milano, Italia
Marco Voltini
Dipartimento di architettura e Studi Urbani (DAStU), Politecnico di Milano, Italia

Published 2026-05-08

Keywords

  • lowland forest,
  • Intermediate Italy,
  • Rural Contexts,
  • Po Valley

How to Cite

Secchi, M., & Voltini, M. (2026). Piuforesta. Il bosco di Piubega e la foresta planiziale padana. Ri-Vista. Research for Landscape Architecture, 23(2), 306–325. https://doi.org/10.36253/rv-17932

Abstract

The Po Valley, once rich in forests, has undergone a drastic reduction in forest cover over the centu-ries due to the advent of modern agriculture. Today, the only remaining traces of the original forests are found along the riverbanks and in a few logging areas. However, the Po Valley lowland forest still resides in the imaginations of planners and citizens as a “low-intensity” myth , a narrative capable of evoking a world beyond our direct experience. The unique case of the Piubega forest, an instance of urban forestation in a municipality in the province of Mantua, provides a valuable opportunity to observe the plurality of discourses, imaginaries, myths, and ideologies that revolve around the pur-suit of forests in the city. Like a Petri dish, Piubega’s forest experience highlights the motives and contradictions in current urban forestation research.

References

  1. Barbera F., Cersosimo D., De Rossi A. (a cura di) 2022, Con-tro i borghi: il Belpaese che dimentica i paesi, Donzelli edi-tore, Roma.
  2. Clark N. 2011, Inhuman Nature, Sage, London.
  3. Czechowski D., Hauck T., Hausladen G., (edited by) 2014, Revising Green Infrastructure: Concepts Between Nature and Design, Taylor and Francis, Hoboken.
  4. Corona G. 2023, L’Italia dell’Antropocene: percorsi di storia ambientale tra XX e XXI secolo, Carocci editore, Roma.
  5. Czúcz B., Baruth B., Angileri V., Prieto Lopez A., Terres J. 2022 Landscape features in the EU Member States – A re-view of existing data and approaches, Publications Office of the European Union.
  6. De Meulder B., Shannon K. 2024, Framing Forest Urbanism A Twenty-First Century Agenda in Id. (edited by), Forest ur-banisms: new non-human and human ecologies for the 21st century, LAP. Leuven University Press, Leuven, pp. 15-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.16834371.5
  7. Del Favero R. 2017 (a cura di), I tipi forestali nella Regione Lombardia, Regione Lombardia. https://www.regione. lombardia.it/wps/portal/istituzionale/HP/DettaglioPub-blicazione/servizi-e-informazioni/enti-e-operatori/agri-coltura/boschi-e-foreste/pub-i-tipi-forestali-della-lom-bardia-agr/i-tipi-forestali-della-lombardia.
  8. Frampton K. 1991, In search of the Modern Landscape in S. Wrede, W.H Adams (edited by), Denatured visions: land-scape and culture in the twentieth century: [this publica-tion derives from a symposium held at the Museum of Modern Art, New York, on October 21 and 22, 1988], ed. Museum of Modern Art, New York. pp 42-61.
  9. Granjou C., Cavin J.S., Boisvert V., Chalmandrier M., Flami-nio S., Kull C., Moretti M. 2023, Researching Cities, Tran-sforming Ecology: An Investigation into Urban Ecology Agendas, «Nature and Culture», n. 18, pp. 148–174. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3167/nc.2023.180202
  10. Harrison R.P. 2009, Forests: the shadow of civilization, Pa-perback ed. Univ. of Chicago Pr, Chicago (first ed. 1992). DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226318059.001.0001
  11. Lanzani A. (a cura di) 2024, Italia di mezzo: Prospettive per la provincia in transizione, Donzelli Editore, Roma.
  12. Latour B. 2018, Tracciare la rotta. Come orientarsi in politi-ca, Cortina, Milano.
  13. Lyytimäki J. 2017, Disservices of urban trees, in F. Rerrini, C.C. Konijnendijk van den Bosch, A. Fini (edited by), Rout-ledge handbook of urban forestry, Routledge, Abingdon and New York, pp. 164-176. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315627106-12
  14. Longo A. 2024, Robinia pseudoacacia, in R. Henderson (edited by), 30 Trees: And Why Landscape Architects Love Them, Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, pp. 190-197. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783035627329-031
  15. Olivetti M.L. 2023, La foresta civile: un breviario per i boschi urbani contemporanei, Libria, Melfi.
  16. Ortoleva P. 2019, Miti a bassa intensità: racconti, media, vi-ta quotidiana, Einaudi, Torino.
  17. Parris K.M., Amati M., Bekessy S.A., Dagenais D., Fryd O., Hahs A.K., Hes D., Imberger S.J., Livesley S.J., Marshall A.J., Rhodes J.R., Threlfall C.G., Tingley R., Van Der Ree R., Wal-sh C.J., Wilkerson M.L., Williams N.S.G. 2018, The seven lamps of planning for biodiversity in the city, «Cities» n. 83, pp. 44–53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2018.06.007
  18. Pellizzoni L. 2021, L’Antropocene come dispositivo gover-namentale, «Politica & Società», n. 3, pp. 495–505.
  19. Pickett S.T.A., Frantzeskaki N., Andersson E., Barau A.S., Childers D.L., Hoover F.-A., Lugo A.E., McPhearson T., Na-gendra H., Schepers S., Sharifi A. 2024, Shifting forward: Urban ecology in perspective, «Ambio», n. 53, pp. 890–897. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-024-02007-6
  20. Pignatti S. 1994, Ecologia del Paesaggio, UTET, Torino.
  21. Shackleton C. M., Ruwanza S., Sinasson Sanni G. K., Ben-nett S., De Lacy P., Modipa R., Mtati N., Sachikonye M., Thondhlana G. 2016, Unpacking Pandora’s Box: Under-standing and Categorising Ecosystem Disservices for Environmental Management and Human Wellbeing, «Ecosystems», n. 19, pp. 587–600. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-015-9952-z
  22. Stein G. 1922, Sacred Emily, in Id., Geography and Plays, The Four Seas Company, Boston, pp. 178-188.
  23. Vagge I. 2022, Le foreste di farnia e carpino bianco della pianura lombarda, in A. Dattero (a cura di), Bosco: biodi-versità, diritti e culture dal Medioevo al nostro tempo, Viel-la, Roma, pp. 297-306.
  24. Vidler, A. 1992, The Architectural Uncanny: Essays in the Mo-dern Unhomely, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.