Published 2026-05-08
Keywords
- Wilderness,
- Western culture,
- Antigone,
- Contemporary wild garden,
- Care
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2025 Silvia Mundula

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Abstract
This paper offers a reflection on the legacy of the wild in contemporary gardens, by exploring its cul-tural perception in Antigone focusing on the consideration that gardens that include wilderness in their design require a particular kind of care, providing a holistic view of the relationship between de-sign and nature. This paper aims to demonstrate how the meaning of the wild completely changes with a greater level of knowledge. In Ancient Greece, nature was not perceived as a separate entity and there was no clear distinction between the natural and the human, or the divine and the earthly. The distinction mainly was between visible and invisible. Wilderness was perceived as something lo-cated outside the city. The wilderness or the desert, in the case of Antigone, were fearsome places mainly because they were unknown. However, Sophocles, by overturning the characters’ spheres of action, reveals a complex perception of the wild, leading to ethical questions. In both the Athenian tragedy and the contemporary garden, wilderness emerges as a value to learn from and as a stora-ge of references.
References
- Clément G. 2004, Le manifeste du Tiers Paysage, Subjet objet, Paris.
- Clément G. 2012, Jardins, Paysage Et Génie Naturel, Fayard, Paris. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/books.cdf.510
- Clément G. 2021, La saggezza del giardiniere. L’arte del giardino planetario, Derive Approdi, Bologna.
- Dagenais D. 2004, The garden of movement: ecological rhetoric in support of gardening practice, «Studies in the History of Gardens & Designed Landscapes», vol. 24, n. 4 pp. 313-340. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14601176.2004.10435330
- Didi-Huberman G. 2018, The Surviving Image: Phantoms of Time and Time of Phantoms: Aby Warburg’s History of Art, Pennsylvania State University Press, Philadelphia [First published in French in 2002].
- Dixon Hunt J. 2000, Greater Perfections: The Practice of Garden Theory, Thames & Hudson, London.
- Dunnet N., Hitchmough J. 2004, The Dynamic Landscape: Design, Ecology and Management of Naturalistic Urban Planting, Taylor & Francis, London.
- Eaton M. M. 1990, New Landscape Metaphors, «Landscape Journal», vol. 9, n. 1, pp. 22-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3368/lj.9.1.22
- Francis M., Hester R. T. (eds.) 1990, The meaning of gar-dens: idea, place and action, MIT press, Cambridge, Mass.
- Freytag A. (ed.) 2020, The Landscapes of Dieter Kienast, gta Verlag, Zurich.
- Ginzburg C. 2013, Clues, Myths, and the Historical Method, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56021/9781421409900
- Glacken C. J. 1976, Traces on the Rhodian shore: nature and culture in western thought from ancient times to the end of the eighteenth century, University of California Press, Oa-kland, CA.
- Grimal P. 1984, Le jardins romains, Librairie Arthème Fayard, Paris.
- Hansen R., Stahl F. 1993, Perennials and their garden habi-tats, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge [First publi-shed in German 1981].
- Harrison R. P. 2008, Gardens: An Essay on the Human Con-dition, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
- Herrington S., Lokman K. 2016, Gardens as Migratory De-vices, in D. Daou and P. Pérez-Ramos (eds.), New Geo-graphies 08: Island, Cambridge MA: Universal Wilde, pp. 142-154.
- Hitchmough J. 2004, Naturalistic herbaceous vegetation for urban landscapes, in N. Dunnett and J. Hitchmough (eds.), The Dynamic Landscape, Spon Press, London/New York, pp. 130-183.
- Kroll L. 1985, Composant, faut-il industrialiser l’architectu-re?, Éditions Socorema, Bruxelles [First published in 1979].
- Lloyd-Jones H. (ed.) 1998, Sophocles, Vol. 2, Harvard Uni-versity Press, Cambridge, Mass.
- McHarg I. 1990, Nature Is More Than a Garden, in M. Fran-cis and R. T. Hester (eds.), The meaning of gardens: idea, place and action, MIT press, Cambridge Mass, pp. 34-36.
- Mosser M., Teyssot G. (eds.) 2000, The history of garden design: the Western tradition from the Renaissance to the present day, Thames & Hudson, New York and London.
- Nassauer J. I. 1988, The Aesthetics of Horticulture: Neat-ness as a Form of Care, «HortScience: a publication of the American Society for Horticultural Science», vol. 23, n. 6, pp. 973-977. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.23.6.973
- Nassauer J. I. 1995, Messy ecosystems, orderly frames, «Landscape Journal», vol. 14, pp. 161-170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3368/lj.14.2.161
- Nassauer J. I. 2011, Care and stewardship: From home to planet, «Landscape and Urban Planning», vol. 100, n. 4, pp. 321-323. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.022
- Oelschlaeger M. 1991, The Idea of wilderness: from prehi-story to the age of ecology, Yale University Press, New Ha-ven.
- Olin L. 2021, Nature and Aesthetics in Planting Design, in M. Treib (ed.), The Aesthetics of Contemporary Planting Design, Oro Editions, Novato, pp. 36-67.
- Olonetzky N. 2017, Inspirations. A Time Travel through Gar-den History, Birkhäuser, Zürich.
- Purves A. 2010, Space and Time in Ancient Greek Narrative. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511750731
- Robinson W. 2012, The Wild Garden, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge [First published 1870].
- Ruff, A.R. 1987, Holland and the Ecological Landscapes 1973-1987, Delft University Press, Delft.
- Stoppani T. 2014, Antigone’s Dissident Dusting: Coating, Revolutions and the Circularity of Dust, in I. Weizman (ed.), Architecture and the Paradox of Dissidence, Routledge, London.