Vol. 14 No. 2 (2025)
Full Research Articles

Towards the knowledge and innovation system for the bioeconomy?

PDF Suppl. Data
  • Giacomo Maria Rinaldi,
  • Davide Viaggi
Giacomo Maria Rinaldi
Alma Mater Studiorum – University of Bologna, Via Zamboni 33, 40126, Bologna, Italy
Davide Viaggi
Alma Mater Studiorum – University of Bologna, Via Zamboni 33, 40126, Bologna, Italy
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36253/bae-17326

Published 2025-07-20

Keywords

  • Italian agriculture,
  • CAP reform,
  • sustainability,
  • multiannual financial framework

How to Cite

Rinaldi, G. M., & Viaggi, D. (2025). Towards the knowledge and innovation system for the bioeconomy?. Bio-Based and Applied Economics, 14(2), 15–30. https://doi.org/10.36253/bae-17326

Copyright (c) 2025 Giacomo Maria Rinaldi, Davide Viaggi

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Abstract

The bioeconomy is a growing sector in both high- and low-income countries, closely linked to innovation. However, knowledge creation and innovation flows remain underexplored due to their complexity. This study aims to introduce the Knowledge and Innovation System for the Bioeconomy (KISB) to analyze sector dynamics. A systematic literature review examined its application, revealing the need for both technology- and collaboration-focused approaches. Key findings emphasize the importance of multi-actor and multidisciplinary strategies, with recent research prioritizing collaboration over innovation. Ethical and market challenges were noted in commercialization. Additionally, the concept of microKISB, operating at an organizational level, offers potential in business and policy research. Ultimately, KISB and microKISB serve as tools for policymakers, businesses, and researchers to drive bioeconomy advancements.

PDF Suppl. Data

References

  1. Alfano, M. R., Cantabene, C., Lepore, A., and Palermo, S. (2023). The green to circular bioeconomy transition: Innovation and resilience among Italian enterprises. Business Strategy and the Environment 32: 6094–6105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3474
  2. Amerani, E., Nastis, S., Loizou, E., and Michailidis, A. (2024). Cross-Analysis of Agricultural Knowledge and Innovation System of Actors’ Interactions in Greece. Journal of Agricultural Extension 28: 9–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2024094029
  3. Aragón, C., Aranguren, M. J., Iturrioz, C., and Wilson, J. R. (2012). A social capital approach for network policy learning: The case of an established cluster initiative. European Urban and Regional Studies 21: 128–145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776411434847
  4. Arnold, E., and Bell, M. (2001). Some New Ideas About Research for Development. Partnership at the Leading Edge: A Danish Vision for Knowledge, Research and Development: 278–316.
  5. Asada, R., Cardellini, G., Mair-Bauernfeind, C., Wenger, J., Haas, V., Holzer, D., and Stern, T. (2020). Effective bioeconomy? a MRIO-based socioeconomic and environmental impact assessment of generic sectoral innovations. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 153: 119946. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119946
  6. Beckenbach, F., Briegel, R., and Daskalakis, M. (2009). Innovation Networks. In Pyka, A. and Scharnhorst, A. (eds), Innovation Networks - Understanding complex systems. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
  7. Bogner, K., and Dahlke, J. (2022). Born to transform? German bioeconomy policy and research projects for transformations towards sustainability. Ecological Economics 195: 107366. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107366
  8. Boschma, R. (2004). Competitiveness of Regions from an Evolutionary Perspective. Regional Studies 38: 1001–1014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340042000292601
  9. Bröring, S., Laibach, N., and Wustmans, M. (2020). Innovation types in the bioeconomy. Journal of Cleaner Production 266: 121939. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121939
  10. Buchmann, T., and Pyka, A. (2015). The evolution of innovation networks: An automotive case study. In The Evolution of Innovation Networks: An Automotive Case Study. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-10383-5
  11. Bueno, C. da S., Masago, F. K., da Silveira, J. M. F. J., Moraes, B. de S., Mendes, L. B. B., and Luna, I. R. (2022). Bioenergy emerging paradigm: Collaborative networks and determinants in the upgrading process of technological frontiers. African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development 14: 1413–1428. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/20421338.2021.1960540
  12. Bugge, M., Hansen, T., and Klitkou, A. (2016). What Is the Bioeconomy? A Review of the Literature. Sustainability 8: 691. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su8070691
  13. Burmaoglu, S., Sartenaer, O., Porter, A., and Li, M. (2019). Analysing the theoretical roots of technology emergence: an evolutionary perspective. Scientometrics 119: 97–118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03033-y
  14. Carayannis, E. G., and Campbell, D. F. J. (2009). ‘Mode 3’ and ‘Quadruple Helix’: toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem. International Journal of Technology Management 46: 201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2009.023374
  15. Carayannis, E. G., and Campbell, D. F. J. (2010). Triple Helix, Quadruple Helix and Quintuple Helix and How Do Knowledge, Innovation and the Environment Relate To Each Other? International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development 1: 41–69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/jsesd.2010010105
  16. Chmielińskii, P., and Wieliczko, B. (2022). Research and innovation challenges for better policies in food systems and bioeconomy transitions – evidence from Poland. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review 25: 789–801. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22434/IFAMR2021.0156
  17. Cooke, P. (1992). Regional innovation systems: Competitive regulation in the new Europe. Geoforum 23: 365–382. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7185(92)90048-9
  18. D’Amato, D., Korhonen-Kurki, K., Lyytikainen, V., Matthies, B. D., and Horcea-Milcu, A. I. (2022). Circular bioeconomy: Actors and dynamics of knowledge co-production in Finland. Forest Policy and Economics 144: 102820. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2022.102820
  19. D’Amato, D., and Korhonen, J. (2021). Integrating the green economy, circular economy and bioeconomy in a strategic sustainability framework. Ecological Economics 188: 107143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107143
  20. Donner, M., and de Vries, H. (2023). Innovative Business Models for a Sustainable Circular Bioeconomy in the French Agrifood Domain. Sustainability (Switzerland) 15: 1–29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15065499
  21. Dosi, G., Freeman, C., Nelson, R., Silverberg, G., and Soete, L. (1988). Technical Change and Economic Theory , G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R. Nelson, G. Silverberg, & L. Soete (eds.). Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant’Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.
  22. Drejerska, N., Vrontis, D., Siachou, E., and Golebiewski, J. (2020). System solutions for the circular economy on the regional level: The case of Green Lungs of Poland. Journal for Global Business Advancement 13: 447–468. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/JGBA.2020.112388
  23. Enger, S. G. (2018). Closed clubs: Network centrality and participation in Horizon 2020. Science and Public Policy 45: 884–896. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scy029
  24. Esposti, R. (2012). Knowledge, technology and innovations for a bio-based economy: Lessons from the past, challenges for the future. Bio-Based and Applied Economics 1: 235–268.
  25. Etzkowitz, H., and Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy 29: 109–123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4
  26. EU-SCAR. (2012). Agricultural knowledge and innovation systems in transition: a reflection paper. Publications Office.
  27. EU-SCAR. (2015). Agricultural knowledge and innovation systems towards the future – a foresight paper. Brussels.
  28. EU-SCAR. (2019). Preparing for Future AKIS in Europe. Brussels, Belgium.:
  29. EU CAP Network. (2023). Learning Portal - Assessing AKIS. https://eu-cap-network.ec.europa.eu/training/evaluation-learning-portal/learning-portal-assessing-akis_en
  30. European Parliament and the Council of the European Union. (2021). Regulation (EU) 2021/2115 of the European Partliament and of the Council. Official Journal of the European Union 2021: 435/1-435/186.
  31. Faulkner, J. P., Murphy, E., and Scott, M. (2024). Bioeconomy, Planning and Sustainable Development: A Theoretical Framework. Sustainability (Switzerland) 16: 1–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16198303
  32. Garud, R., Tuertscher, P., and Van De Ven, A. H. (2013). Perspectives on innovation processes. Academy of Management Annals 7: 775–819. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2013.791066
  33. GBS. (2024). IACGB Communiqué. Nairobi, Kenya.: https://gbs2024.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/IACGB-Communique-24October2024.pdf
  34. Germundsson, L. B., and Norrman, C. (2023). Market Formation and the Role of the Farmer in a Micro-level Agri-food Innovation System. International Journal on Food System Dynamics 14: 394–406. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18461/ijfsd.v14i4.H3
  35. Giurca, A., and Metz, T. (2018). A social network analysis of Germany’s wood-based bioeconomy: Social capital and shared beliefs. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 26: 1–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2017.09.001
  36. Godin, B. (2006). The Linear Model of Innovation. Science, Technology, & Human Values 31: 639–667. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243906291865
  37. Hartung, F., and Schiemann, J. (2014). Precise plant breeding using new genome editing techniques: Opportunities, safety and regulation in the EU. Plant Journal 78: 742–752. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.12413
  38. Hopp, C., Antons, D., Kaminski, J., and Salge, T. O. (2018). The Topic Landscape of Disruption Research—A Call for Consolidation, Reconciliation, and Generalization. Journal of Product Innovation Management 35: 458–487. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12440
  39. Hurtado, A. R., and Berbel, J. (2023). Learning, knowledge, and the role of government: a qualitative system dynamics analysis of Andalusia’s circular bioeconomy. Bio-Based and Applied Economics 12: 141–164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36253/bae-13504
  40. Ingram, J., and Maye, D. (2020). What Are the Implications of Digitalisation for Agricultural Knowledge? Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems 4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2020.00066
  41. Jacobsen, S. E., Sørensen, M., Pedersen, S. M., and Weiner, J. (2013). Feeding the world: Genetically modified crops versus agricultural biodiversity. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 33: 651–662. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-013-0138-9
  42. Johnson, F. X., Canales, N., Fielding, M., Gladkykh, G., Aung, M. T., Bailis, R., Ogeya, M., and Olsson, O. (2022). A comparative analysis of bioeconomy visions and pathways based on stakeholder dialogues in Colombia, Rwanda, Sweden, and Thailand. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 24: 680–700. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2022.2037412
  43. Joint Research Centre European Commission. (2022). Bioeconomy strategy development in EU regions , M. Borzacchiello, J. Sanchez Lopez, & M. Avraamides (eds.). Publications Office of the European Union.
  44. Julio, A. B., and German, E. (2001). Agricultural knowledge and information systems and poverty reduction. The World Bank: 45.
  45. Kamath, R., Elola, A., and Hermans, F. (2023). The green-restructuring of clusters: investigating a biocluster’s transition using a complex adaptive system model. European Planning Studies 31: 1842–1867. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2022.2141054
  46. Klerkx, L., and Begemann, S. (2020). Supporting food systems transformation: The what, why, who, where and how of mission-oriented agricultural innovation systems. Agricultural Systems 184. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2020.102901
  47. Klerkx, L., Van Mierlo, B., and Leeuwis, C. (2012). Evolution of systems approaches to agricultural innovation: Concepts, analysis and interventions. In Farming Systems Research into the 21st Century: The New Dynamic. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4503-2_20
  48. Knierim, A., and Birke, F. M. (2023). Visualised AKIS Diagnosis – an Instrumental Approach to Support AKIS Appraisal. EuroChoices 22: 59–70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1746-692X.12397
  49. Korhonen, J., Koskivaara, A., and Toppinen, A. (2020). Riding a Trojan horse? Future pathways of the fiber-based packaging industry in the bioeconomy. Forest Policy and Economics 110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2018.08.010
  50. Kurtsal, Y., Rinaldi, G. M., Savini, F., Sirri, R., Melin, M., Pacetti, E., De Cesare, A., Fioravanti, M., Luppi, E., Manfreda, G., and Viaggi, D. (2024). Improving the Education and Training Policies of the Agri-Food and Forestry Sectors: Identifying New Strategies to Meet the Needs of the Sector and Farm-to-Fork Priorities. Sustainability (Switzerland) 16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16031267
  51. Laasonen, V. (2023). Exposing the role of relational capabilities in business–research–government cooperation: examples from the transition towards a bioeconomy in Finland. European Planning Studies 31: 1226–1246. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2022.2112152
  52. Lang, S., Minnucci, G., Mueller, M., and Schlaile, M. P. (2023). The Role of Consumers in Business Model Innovations for a Sustainable Circular Bioeconomy. Sustainability (Switzerland) 15: 1–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15129573
  53. Lazarevic, D., Kautto, P., and Antikainen, R. (2020). Finland’s wood-frame multi-storey construction innovation system: Analysing motors of creative destruction. Forest Policy and Economics 110: 101861. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2019.01.006
  54. Lewandowski, I. (2018). Bioeconomy , I. Lewandowski (ed.). Cham: Springer International Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68152-8
  55. Loos, T. K., Hoppe, M., Dzomeku, B. M., and Scheiterle, L. (2018). The potential of plantain residues for the ghanaian bioeconomy-assessing the current fiber value web. Sustainability (Switzerland) 10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124825
  56. Losacker, S., Heiden, S., Liefner, I., and Lucas, H. (2023). Rethinking bioeconomy innovation in sustainability transitions. Technology in Society 74: 102291. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102291
  57. Lovrić, N., Lovrić, M., and Mavsar, R. (2020). Factors behind development of innovations in European forest-based bioeconomy. Forest Policy and Economics 111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2019.102079
  58. Lundvall, B.-Å. (1985). Product Innovation and User-Producer Interaction Product Innovation and User-Producer Interaction. In Product Innovation and User-Producer Interaction (Issue January 1985).
  59. Lundvall, B.-Å. (1992). User-Producer Relationships, National Systems of Innovation and Internationalisation. In Lundvall, Bengt-Åke (ed.), National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. Pinter Publishers, 45–67.
  60. M’barek, R., and Wesseler, J. (2023). The Rapid Development of Bioeconomy Policies in the EU and other Regions of the World. EuroChoices 22: 5–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1746-692X.12415
  61. Malerba, F. (2002). Sectoral systems of innovation and production. Research Policy 31: 247–264. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00139-1
  62. Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., and Altman, D. G. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine 6: e1000097. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
  63. Nelson, R., Freeman, C., Lundvall, B.-A., and Pelikan, P. (1988). Part V - National Systems of innovation. In Dosi, G., Freeman, C., Nelson, R., Silverberg, G., and Soete, L. (eds), Technical Change and Economic Theory. Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant’Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy, 309–398.
  64. Nelson, R. R. (1993). National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis. Oxford University Press.
  65. OECD. (2012). Improving Agricultural Knowledge and Innovation Systems. In Improving Agricultural Knowledge and Innovation Systems.
  66. Orozco, R., and Grundmann, P. (2022). Readiness for Innovation of Emerging Grass-Based Businesses. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity 8: 180. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8040180
  67. Protogerou, A., Caloghirou, Y., and Siokas, E. (2010). The impact of EU policy-driven research networks on the diffusion and deployment of innovation at the national level: The case of Greece. Science and Public Policy 37: 283–296. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3152/030234210X496637
  68. Pyka, A. (2017). Dedicated innovation systems to support the transformation towards sustainability: Creating income opportunities and employment in the knowledge-based digital bioeconomy. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity 3: 1–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40852-017-0079-7
  69. Pyka, A., and Scharnhorst, A. (2009). Innovation Networks , A. Pyka & A. Scharnhorst (eds.). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-92267-4
  70. Röling, N. G. (1988). Extension science: Information systems in agricultural development. CUP Archive.
  71. Röling, N., and Wagemakers, A. (1998). Facilitating sustainable agriculture: participatory learning and adaptive management in times of environmental uncertainty. , N. Roling & A. Wagemakers (eds.). United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
  72. Rubach, S., Hoholm, T., and Håkansson, H. (2017). Innovation networks or innovation within networks. IMP Journal 11: 178–206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IMP-09-2015-0057
  73. Russo, M., and Rossi, F. (2009). Cooperation networks and innovation: A complex systems perspective to the analysis and evaluation of a regional innovation policy programme. Evaluation 15: 75–99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389008097872
  74. Salvador, R., Puglieri, F. N., Halog, A., Andrade, F. G. d., Piekarski, C. M., and De Francisco, A. C. (2021). Key aspects for designing business models for a circular bioeconomy. Journal of Cleaner Production 278: 124341. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124341
  75. Scheiterle, L., Ulmer, A., Birner, R., and Pyka, A. (2018). From commodity-based value chains to biomass-based value webs: The case of sugarcane in Brazil’s bioeconomy. Journal of Cleaner Production 172: 3851–3863. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.150
  76. Schmidt, P. G., Díaz-Puente, J. M., and Bettoni, M. (2022). How rurality influences interactive innovation processes: lessons learnt from 15 case studies in 12 countries. European Planning Studies 30: 2595–2617. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2022.2043832
  77. Spielman, D. J., and Birner, R. (2008). How innovative is your agriculture?: Using innovation indicators and benchmarks to strengthen national agricultural innovation systems. World Bank Washington, DC, USA.
  78. Sutherland, L. A., Adamsone-Fiskovica, A., Elzen, B., Koutsouris, A., Laurent, C., Stræte, E. P., and Labarthe, P. (2023). Advancing AKIS with assemblage thinking. Journal of Rural Studies 97: 57–69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2022.11.005
  79. Sutherland, L. A., Madureira, L., Elzen, B., Noble, C., Bechtet, N., Townsend, L., Zarokosta, E., and Triboulet, P. (2022). What Can We Learn from Droppers and Non-adopters About the Role of Advice in Agricultural Innovation? EuroChoices 21: 40–49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1746-692X.12353
  80. Taffuri, A., Sciullo, A., Diemer, A., and Nedelciu, C. E. (2021). Integrating circular bioeconomy and urban dynamics to define an innovative management of bio-waste: The study case of turin. Sustainability (Switzerland) 13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116224
  81. Torre, A., Wallet, F., and Huang, J. (2023). A collaborative and multidisciplinary approach to knowledge-based rural development: 25 years of the PSDR program in France. Journal of Rural Studies 97: 428–437. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2022.12.034
  82. Van Lancker, J., Wauters, E., and Van Huylenbroeck, G. (2016). Managing innovation in the bioeconomy: An open innovation perspective. Biomass and Bioenergy 90: 60–69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2016.03.017
  83. Viaggi, D. (2018). The bioeconomy: delivering sustainable green growth , D. Hemming (ed.). Oxfordshire, UK ; Boston, MA: CABI. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1079/9781786392756.0000
  84. Viaggi, D. ., Bartolini, F., and Raggi, M. (2021). The Bioeconomy in economic literature: looking back, looking ahead. Bio-Based and Applied Economics 10: 169–184. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36253/bae-10881
  85. Vilkė, R., and Gedminaitė-Raudonė, Ž. (2020). Collaboration between government and agribusiness for biogas production: Balanced development of rural sustainability. Public Policy and Administration 19: 298–313.
  86. Vivien, F.-D., Nieddu, M., Befort, N., Debref, R., and Giampietro, M. (2019). The Hijacking of the Bioeconomy. Ecological Economics 159: 189–197. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.01.027
  87. Vogelpohl, T., and Töller, A. E. (2021). Perspectives on the bioeconomy as an emerging policy field. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning 23: 143–151. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2021.1901394
  88. Wei, X., Liu, Q., Pu, A., Wang, S., Chen, F., Zhang, L., Zhang, Y., Dong, Z., and Wan, X. (2022). Knowledge Mapping of bioeconomy: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production 373: 133824. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133824
  89. Weisenfeld, U., Hauerwaas, A., Elshiewy, O., Halder, P., Wesseler, J., Cingiz, K., and Broer, I. (2023). Beyond plastic – Consumers prefer food packaging derived from genetically modified plants. Research Policy 52: 104883. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2023.104883

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >>