Vol. 23 No. 2 (2025): Nature, Myth, Design
Genealogie del mito / Genealogies of Myth

Paesaggi del tempo profondo tra mitopoiesi e desiderio di permanenza.

PDF
  • Paola Sabbion
Paola Sabbion
Dipartimento Architettura e Design, Università degli Studi di Genova, Italia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36253/rv-17947

Published 2026-05-08

Keywords

  • Geological turn,
  • Deep time,
  • Nature,
  • Uncanny,
  • Mythopoiesis

How to Cite

Sabbion, P. (2026). Paesaggi del tempo profondo tra mitopoiesi e desiderio di permanenza. Ri-Vista. Research for Landscape Architecture, 23(2), 94–113. https://doi.org/10.36253/rv-17947

Copyright (c) 2025 Paola Sabbion

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Abstract

In an era when ecological imaginaries tend to equate nature with a mutable, vegetal realm of growth and transformation, a more radical narrative emerges — that of the inorganic, the endur-ing, and the indifferent: a geological nature that asserts itself as a mute, opaque, and solid archive of deep time. The growing interest in rock, soil, and the Earth’s deep dynamics within the languag-es of contemporary art, architecture, and landscape is interpreted as a long-term mythopoiesis, in which nature is perceived not as care or refuge, but as a multiple alterity in which we are immersed. This essay investigates some contemporary design trajectories through the lens of the myth of a na-ture ‘indifferent’ to the human, engaging with the concepts of deep time and non-organic matter. Through theoretical and design references, the essay explores how the inorganic dimension can re-introduce into landscape design a tension between discontinuity and permanence, emergence and sedimentation.

PDF

References

  1. Andreu T., Pertuzé C. (a cura di) 2011, Blanca Montaña: Ar-quitectura reciente en Chile / White Mountain. Architecture in Chile, Ediciones Puro Chile, Santiago.
  2. Aragon L. 1966 (1926), Le Paysan de Paris, Éditions Galli-mard, Paris.
  3. Caillois R. 1985, La scrittura delle pietre, Einaudi, Torino (ed or. 1970, L’écriture des pierres, Skira, Paris).
  4. City of Seattle 2005, Freeway Park Landmark Nomination Report, https://www.seattle.gov/documents/de-partments/neighborhoods/historicpreservation/land-marks/relateddocuments/desrpt_freewaypark.pdf> (06/25)
  5. Cortesi I. 2022, Il paesaggio al centro. Realtà e interpreta-zione, LetteraVentidue, Siracusa.
  6. Cortesi I. 2024, Imparare da e con il paesaggio, Intervista a Catherine Mosbach, LetteraVentidue, Siracusa.
  7. Dusi E. 2025, La caverna buia di Onkalo. Nasconderà l’ura-nio per 100 mila anni, oltre la fine dell’umanità, «La Repub-blica», 22 Maggio 2025, https://www.repubblica. it/cronaca/2025/05/22/news/deposito_scorie_radioatti-ve_nucleari_olkiluoto_finlandia-424575115/> (09/25).
  8. Moller y Asociados 2008. Intervencion en Punta Pite. Chi-le, in «Paisea revista de paisajismo», n.5 (2008), pp. 26-29.
  9. Ferriss H. 1929, The Metropolis of Tomorrow, Ives Wash-burn, New York.
  10. Gibney E. 2015, Why Finland now leads the world in nucle-ar waste storage, «Nature», http://www.nature. com/news/why-finland-now-leads-the-world-in-nu-clear-waste-storage-1.18903> (10/25), doi:10.1038/na-ture.2015.18903. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature.2015.18903
  11. Harmansah Ö. 2020, Deep Time an Landscape History: How can Historical Particularity Be Translated?, in B. Wig-gin, C. Fornoff, P. E. Kim (a cura di), Timescales: Thinking Across Ecological Temporalities, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5749/j.ctv1cdxg76.6
  12. Heesche J., Braae E. M., Jørgensen G. 2022, Land-scape-Based Transformation of Young Industrial Land-scapes, «Land», n.11(6), p. 908, (10/25). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/land11060908
  13. Hirsch A. B. 2014, City Choreographer: Lawrence Halprin in Urban Renewal America, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5749/minnesota/9780816679782.001.0001
  14. Koolhaas R. 1978, Delirious New York: A Retroactive Mani-festo for Manhattan, The Monacelli Press, New York.
  15. Latour B. 2017, Facing Gaia: Eight Lectures on the New Cli-matic Regime, Polity Press, Cambridge.
  16. Luciani D. 2012, Luogo come ierofania, in Id. (a cura di), Il luogo e il sacro: Contributi all’indagine sul linguaggio sim-bolico dei luoghi, Edizioni Fondazione Benetton Studi Ri-cerche con Canova, Treviso.
  17. Macfarlane R. 2019, Underland: A Deep Time Journey, Hamish Hamilton, London.
  18. Madsen M. 2010, Into Eternity: A Film for the Future, I Wonder Pictures, Denmark.
  19. Metta A. 2022, Il paesaggio è un mostro. Città selvatiche e nature ibride, DeriveApprodi, Roma.
  20. Martignoni J., Pearson D., Moller T. 2014, Teresa Moller: Un-veiling the Landscape, Hatje Cantz Verlag, Berlin.
  21. Martignoni J. 2022, Teresa Moller: Reflections in the Land-scape, Arquine.
  22. Morton T. 2018, Iperoggetti. Filosofia ed Ecologia dopo la Fine del Mondo, (trad. it. a cura di V. Santarcangelo), Nero, Roma (ed. orig. 2013, Hyperobjects. Philosophy and Ecol-ogy after the End of the World, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis).
  23. Morton T. 2019, Ecologia oscura. Logica della coesistenza futura, Nottetempo, Roma (ed or. 2018, Dark Ecology: For a Logic of Future Coexistence, Columbia University Press).
  24. Mosbach C., Daval A. 2016, De sol, d’air, d’eau sous pho-tons, «Projets de paysage», n.14, (10/25). DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/paysage.8317
  25. Piranesi G. B. 1756, Le Antichità Romane, Tomo IV, tav. XIX, Roma.
  26. Robertson I. 2012, Replanting Freeway Park: Preserving a Masterpiece, «Landscape Journal», n.31 (1–2), pp. 77–99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3368/lj.31.1-2.77
  27. Sartre J.-P. 1943, L’Être et le Néant, Gallimard, Paris.
  28. Sautot D. 2013, Catherine Mosbach, paysages telluriques, «L’Architecture d’Aujourd’hui», 394.
  29. Stuart-Smith T. 2024, Rock And A Hard Place, «The World of Interiors», https://www.worldofinteriors.com/story/punta-pite-chile-teresa-moller> (10/25).
  30. The Cultural Landscape Foundation (TCLF) 2006, Freeway Park: Past, Present and Future?, https://www.tclf. org/freeway-park-past-present-and-future> (10/25).
  31. The Cultural Landscape Foundation (TCLF), 2017, Freeway Park (1969–76), https://www.tclf.org/landscapes/freeway-park> (10/25).
  32. Weller R. 2001, Between hermeneutics and datascapes: a critical appreciation of emergent landscape design theo-ry and praxis through the writings of James Corner 1990–2000 (Part One), «Landscape Review», vol.7, n. 1, pp. 3–24.
  33. Yourcenar M. 1992, La mente nera di Piranesi, in Id., Il tem-po, grande scultore, Bompiani, Milano (ed. or. 1991, Le Cer-veau noir de Piranèse (1959 et 1961), in Sous bénéfice d’in-ventaire, La Pléiade).

Most read articles by the same author(s)